Expecting Rain

Go to main page
It is currently Thu June 20th, 2013, 08:08 GMT

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 182 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 8  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: New album is apparently 68 mins long..
PostPosted: Sun May 27th, 2012, 09:51 GMT 

Joined: Sat June 18th, 2011, 08:44 GMT
Posts: 354
it features 10 tracks, including the 14 minute Titanic and another 9 minute effort. (See Isis link on ER homepage.)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New album is apparently 68 mins long..
PostPosted: Sun May 27th, 2012, 10:11 GMT 
User avatar

Joined: Sun June 15th, 2008, 19:17 GMT
Posts: 2597
Location: Wrapped in parcel paper
Interesting stuff..


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New album is apparently 68 mins long..
PostPosted: Sun May 27th, 2012, 10:16 GMT 
User avatar

Joined: Mon November 1st, 2010, 15:20 GMT
Posts: 1817
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
I really hope it will come out before September.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New album is apparently 68 mins long..
PostPosted: Sun May 27th, 2012, 10:20 GMT 
User avatar

Joined: Tue November 22nd, 2011, 03:56 GMT
Posts: 1496
Location: Felony room
It's really exciting for me because I think I was still a moderate and less passionate Dylan listener around the time Together Through Life came out; now I can actually anticipate a new album of his and really look forward to it!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New album is apparently 68 mins long..
PostPosted: Sun May 27th, 2012, 10:31 GMT 
Promethium Member

Joined: Tue December 14th, 2010, 15:22 GMT
Posts: 19838
Location: to over there and back
I'm told ISIS will have more information, probably to be posted early next week.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New album is apparently 68 mins long..
PostPosted: Sun May 27th, 2012, 11:53 GMT 

Joined: Fri October 7th, 2005, 15:30 GMT
Posts: 78
Great news, this is sounding very good indeed. Hope we see it before September though ;)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New album is apparently 68 mins long..
PostPosted: Sun May 27th, 2012, 12:06 GMT 
User avatar

Joined: Wed June 22nd, 2011, 11:06 GMT
Posts: 3142
Location: Athens, Greece
I want it soo bad :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New album is apparently 68 mins long..
PostPosted: Sun May 27th, 2012, 12:24 GMT 

Joined: Mon November 15th, 2004, 14:51 GMT
Posts: 358
Location: Arezzo, Tuscany, Italy.
I'm not sure what we're supposed to extrapolate from an album or track timing. Highlands, Sad Eyed Lady etc. Long a unremittingly dull... Blowin In The Wind, Shooting Star etc. short and rather good. TOOM long and full of filler.... L&T shorter and quite surprisingly good.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New album is apparently 68 mins long..
PostPosted: Sun May 27th, 2012, 13:00 GMT 
Promethium Member

Joined: Tue December 14th, 2010, 15:22 GMT
Posts: 19838
Location: to over there and back
TOOM and "LAT" are equally good, just for different kinds of moods.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New album is apparently 68 mins long..
PostPosted: Sun May 27th, 2012, 13:24 GMT 
Mercury Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri July 15th, 2011, 03:23 GMT
Posts: 10633
From front page:

26 May 2012
Bob Dylan’s New Album: The Story So Far
Our sources indicated in late February that Bob Dylan had been into the studio with members of his tour band to record a new album. The sessions are reported to have begun in January 2012 at Groove Masters, a semi-private studio facility owned by musician Jackson Browne. The studio, on Colorado Avenue, Santa Monica, is where Dylan recorded both “Together Through Life” and “Christmas In The Heart”. He is said to have spent up to two months working on the album.
 
Then, in March, David Hidalgo revealed to The Aspen Times that he had been involved with the recording of a New Dylan album and that whilst he had been brought in primarily to play accordion and guitar, he ended up adding Mexican instruments,  including tres, to some tracks. Hidalgo said the recording sessions were nothing like the earlier ones he had done with Dylan. He had previously played accordion and guitar on “Together Through Life” and accordion, guitar, mandolin and violin on “Christmas In The Heart”.
 
Next, it was leaked on the Internet that Uncut’s Alan Jones would get to hear the album week commencing May 14. It’s not certain that any such a listening session actually took place.
 
Nevertheless, some individuals, on both sides of the Atlantic, are anticipating media listening session in the near future– the likes of Rolling Stone magazine and USA Today have been mentioned. Given the restrictions that apply, it is doubtful whether these events will yield any more information. Sony’s marketing people will have a plan and letting people like us know, people who actually buy the albums, would mean that they have little purpose in life.
 
Listening sessions for Sony staff in New York and London have already taken place but those attending are warned not to talk about the album.
 
ISIS received information about a 14-minute Titanic song before this rumour was carried on the Internet. It is, however, our policy not to publish such rumours until we get some form of independent confirmation. This has now been forthcoming.
 
Meanwhile, we have heard the album will contain 10 tracks and is 68 minutes long. The most likely release date is September, prior to the Grammy deadline and in the run-up to the holiday season. This fits a common pattern in the past. As well as the 14 minute song, there is believed to be another that is 9 minutes in length.
 
There are, as so often in these situations, unconfirmed stories. We are currently trying to check out a couple of these. Watch this space. 


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New album is apparently 68 mins long..
PostPosted: Sun May 27th, 2012, 13:38 GMT 
User avatar

Joined: Sat September 22nd, 2007, 17:15 GMT
Posts: 520
Location: The Netherlands
Jonnie Falafel wrote:
I'm not sure what we're supposed to extrapolate from an album or track timing. Highlands, Sad Eyed Lady etc. Long a unremittingly dull... Blowin In The Wind, Shooting Star etc. short and rather good. TOOM long and full of filler.... L&T shorter and quite surprisingly good.


Really? If he'd write another Highlands, or Sad Eyed Lady of the Lowlands, that would make my.. year. Actually, come to think of it, are there any longer songs (say 7 min+) that are not good?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New album is apparently 68 mins long..
PostPosted: Sun May 27th, 2012, 14:00 GMT 
User avatar

Joined: Tue November 22nd, 2011, 03:56 GMT
Posts: 1496
Location: Felony room
Jeeps wrote:
Actually, come to think of it, are there any longer songs (say 7 min+) that are not good?

"Joey"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New album is apparently 68 mins long..
PostPosted: Sun May 27th, 2012, 14:16 GMT 

Joined: Wed July 14th, 2010, 02:19 GMT
Posts: 45
TheGunfighter wrote:
Jeeps wrote:
Actually, come to think of it, are there any longer songs (say 7 min+) that are not good?

"Joey"


I enjoy Joey.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New album is apparently 68 mins long..
PostPosted: Sun May 27th, 2012, 14:21 GMT 
Promethium Member

Joined: Tue December 14th, 2010, 15:22 GMT
Posts: 19838
Location: to over there and back
^^
Levy talked him into that.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New album is apparently 68 mins long..
PostPosted: Sun May 27th, 2012, 14:24 GMT 
Titanium Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed January 9th, 2008, 14:29 GMT
Posts: 7627
Jonnie Falafel wrote:
I'm not sure what we're supposed to extrapolate from an album or track timing. Highlands, Sad Eyed Lady etc. Long a unremittingly dull... Blowin In The Wind, Shooting Star etc. short and rather good. TOOM long and full of filler.... L&T shorter and quite surprisingly good.


Blasphemy!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New album is apparently 68 mins long..
PostPosted: Sun May 27th, 2012, 14:50 GMT 
User avatar

Joined: Tue November 22nd, 2011, 03:56 GMT
Posts: 1496
Location: Felony room
midnightrain wrote:
I enjoy Joey.

I used to enjoy it. When I learned "Abandoned Love" was dropped from the album in favor of that... I didn't enjoy it anymore. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New album is apparently 68 mins long..
PostPosted: Sun May 27th, 2012, 15:26 GMT 
User avatar

Joined: Wed August 31st, 2011, 14:57 GMT
Posts: 686
TheGunfighter wrote:
Jeeps wrote:
Actually, come to think of it, are there any longer songs (say 7 min+) that are not good?

"Joey"


What exactly don't you like about "Joey"? I think it's great.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New album is apparently 68 mins long..
PostPosted: Sun May 27th, 2012, 15:27 GMT 
Promethium Member

Joined: Tue December 14th, 2010, 15:22 GMT
Posts: 19838
Location: to over there and back
Still Go Barefoot wrote:
From front page:

26 May 2012
Bob Dylan’s New Album: The Story So Far
Our sources indicated in late February that Bob Dylan had been into the studio with members of his tour band to record a new album. The sessions are reported to have begun in January 2012 at Groove Masters, a semi-private studio facility owned by musician Jackson Browne. The studio, on Colorado Avenue, Santa Monica, is where Dylan recorded both “Together Through Life” and “Christmas In The Heart”. He is said to have spent up to two months working on the album.
 
Then, in March, David Hidalgo revealed to The Aspen Times that he had been involved with the recording of a New Dylan album and that whilst he had been brought in primarily to play accordion and guitar, he ended up adding Mexican instruments,  including tres, to some tracks. Hidalgo said the recording sessions were nothing like the earlier ones he had done with Dylan. He had previously played accordion and guitar on “Together Through Life” and accordion, guitar, mandolin and violin on “Christmas In The Heart”.
 
Next, it was leaked on the Internet that Uncut’s Alan Jones would get to hear the album week commencing May 14. It’s not certain that any such a listening session actually took place.
 
Nevertheless, some individuals, on both sides of the Atlantic, are anticipating media listening session in the near future– the likes of Rolling Stone magazine and USA Today have been mentioned. Given the restrictions that apply, it is doubtful whether these events will yield any more information. Sony’s marketing people will have a plan and letting people like us know, people who actually buy the albums, would mean that they have little purpose in life.
 
Listening sessions for Sony staff in New York and London have already taken place but those attending are warned not to talk about the album.
 
ISIS received information about a 14-minute Titanic song before this rumour was carried on the Internet. It is, however, our policy not to publish such rumours until we get some form of independent confirmation. This has now been forthcoming.
 
Meanwhile, we have heard the album will contain 10 tracks and is 68 minutes long. The most likely release date is September, prior to the Grammy deadline and in the run-up to the holiday season. This fits a common pattern in the past. As well as the 14 minute song, there is believed to be another that is 9 minutes in length.
 
There are, as so often in these situations, unconfirmed stories. We are currently trying to check out a couple of these. Watch this space. 


^^
The above is from the new ISIS website. Credit where credit is due. :wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New album is apparently 68 mins long..
PostPosted: Sun May 27th, 2012, 15:37 GMT 
Mercury Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun January 4th, 2009, 09:02 GMT
Posts: 13031
Location: South of the mountains of Madrid.
Viktor123 wrote:
I really hope it will come out before September.

on my birthday!!!!... :D


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New album is apparently 68 mins long..
PostPosted: Sun May 27th, 2012, 16:14 GMT 
User avatar

Joined: Sat April 18th, 2009, 22:24 GMT
Posts: 4738
Still Go Barefoot wrote:
From front page:

26 May 2012
Bob Dylan’s New Album: The Story So Far
Our sources indicated in late February that Bob Dylan had been into the studio with members of his tour band to record a new album. The sessions are reported to have begun in January 2012 at Groove Masters, a semi-private studio facility owned by musician Jackson Browne. The studio, on Colorado Avenue, Santa Monica, is where Dylan recorded both “Together Through Life” and “Christmas In The Heart”. He is said to have spent up to two months working on the album.
 
Then, in March, David Hidalgo revealed to The Aspen Times that he had been involved with the recording of a New Dylan album and that whilst he had been brought in primarily to play accordion and guitar, he ended up adding Mexican instruments,  including tres, to some tracks. Hidalgo said the recording sessions were nothing like the earlier ones he had done with Dylan. He had previously played accordion and guitar on “Together Through Life” and accordion, guitar, mandolin and violin on “Christmas In The Heart”.
 
Next, it was leaked on the Internet that Uncut’s Alan Jones would get to hear the album week commencing May 14. It’s not certain that any such a listening session actually took place.
 
Nevertheless, some individuals, on both sides of the Atlantic, are anticipating media listening session in the near future– the likes of Rolling Stone magazine and USA Today have been mentioned. Given the restrictions that apply, it is doubtful whether these events will yield any more information. Sony’s marketing people will have a plan and letting people like us know, people who actually buy the albums, would mean that they have little purpose in life.
 
Listening sessions for Sony staff in New York and London have already taken place but those attending are warned not to talk about the album.
 
ISIS received information about a 14-minute Titanic song before this rumour was carried on the Internet. It is, however, our policy not to publish such rumours until we get some form of independent confirmation. This has now been forthcoming.
 
Meanwhile, we have heard the album will contain 10 tracks and is 68 minutes long. The most likely release date is September, prior to the Grammy deadline and in the run-up to the holiday season. This fits a common pattern in the past. As well as the 14 minute song, there is believed to be another that is 9 minutes in length.
 
There are, as so often in these situations, unconfirmed stories. We are currently trying to check out a couple of these. Watch this space. 



isis, post the information as soon as possible, dont let the blog get up on first. dont bother with niceties. throw it up on there. i beleive mr jones may know more than hes telling. his silence roars a thousand words.
dont let the unconfirmed nature of the stories hold you back let them fly.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New album is apparently 68 mins long..
PostPosted: Sun May 27th, 2012, 16:23 GMT 
Promethium Member

Joined: Tue December 14th, 2010, 15:22 GMT
Posts: 19838
Location: to over there and back
We want it all and we want it now. :roll:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New album is apparently 68 mins long..
PostPosted: Sun May 27th, 2012, 16:28 GMT 
Mercury Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat October 27th, 2007, 13:44 GMT
Posts: 11582
Location: Probably killing time in a supermarket while sig. other compares organic fruits
Isis prefers to only print things that are confirmed, which I consider very valuable although having things to speculate about is fun, I admit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New album is apparently 68 mins long..
PostPosted: Sun May 27th, 2012, 16:36 GMT 
User avatar

Joined: Sat April 18th, 2009, 22:24 GMT
Posts: 4738
Johanna Parker wrote:
We want it all and we want it now. :roll:



if you got em let me roll. dont go saying you had first but didnt wanna say. just lay em on the people. whats the difference between an unconfirmed and a confirmed rumor anyways.
if you miss a few thats no shame.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New album is apparently 68 mins long..
PostPosted: Sun May 27th, 2012, 17:28 GMT 
User avatar

Joined: Sun February 13th, 2011, 16:42 GMT
Posts: 140
Location: NB, Canada
Tim Finnegan wrote:
TheGunfighter wrote:
Actually, come to think of it, are there any longer songs (say 7 min+) that are not good?


What exactly don't you like about "Joey"? I think it's great.


I think Joey is a great song too... I have no idea why it gets dissed so much. Besides, its hardly Dylans... I remeber him saying in an interview that Jacques Levy wrote most of it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New album is apparently 68 mins long..
PostPosted: Sun May 27th, 2012, 17:52 GMT 
Mercury Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat October 27th, 2007, 13:44 GMT
Posts: 11582
Location: Probably killing time in a supermarket while sig. other compares organic fruits
goombay wrote:
Johanna Parker wrote:
We want it all and we want it now. :roll:



if you got em let me roll. dont go saying you had first but didnt wanna say. just lay em on the people. whats the difference between an unconfirmed and a confirmed rumor anyways.
if you miss a few thats no shame.

The difference is that one is reporting something factual about the album and the other is repeating rumors.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 182 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 8  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: fredwau, songanddanceman, WrittenInMySoul


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group